IP Assignment, PIIAs, and Work for Hire: How Startups Make Sure They Own Their IP
How startups secure ownership of code and inventions from founders, employees, and contractors through IP assignment agreements, PIIAs, and work for hire.
Key takeaways
- Founders, employees, and contractors should each sign a written IP assignment that fits their role, ideally before any work begins.
- Software written by an independent contractor generally does not become a work made for hire automatically, so contractor agreements need a present assignment.
- PIIAs should list prior inventions and include any state law notices, such as the notice tied to California Labor Code section 2870.
- Gaps in the IP chain of title often surface during financing or acquisition diligence, when they are harder and more expensive to fix.
How does a startup make sure it owns its IP?
A startup secures its IP by having every person who creates technology for it sign a written agreement that assigns their rights to the company. Founders sign a technology assignment, employees sign a proprietary information and inventions assignment agreement (PIIA), and contractors sign an agreement with a present assignment of work product.
Ownership does not follow payment automatically. Under US copyright law, the person who writes code is generally its author unless the work qualifies as a work made for hire, and patent rights in an invention start with the individual inventor. A company that pays for development without the right paperwork may end up with, at most, an implied license rather than ownership.
The fix is straightforward when it is done early. The same fix can be difficult when a founder has left, a contractor cannot be located, or a dispute has already started.
What does work made for hire mean under copyright law?
Under 17 U.S.C. section 101, a work made for hire is either a work prepared by an employee within the scope of employment, or a specially commissioned work that falls into one of nine statutory categories and is covered by a written agreement signed by both parties.
When a work is made for hire, the employer or commissioning party is treated as the author and owner from the start. The nine categories for commissioned works are a contribution to a collective work, part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, a translation, a supplementary work, a compilation, an instructional text, a test, answer material for a test, and an atlas.
The US Copyright Office explains that whether someone is an employee for this purpose depends on general agency law factors, such as the hiring party’s right to control the manner and means of the work, not simply on what the contract calls the relationship.
Who owns code written by a contractor?
Absent a written assignment, an independent contractor who writes software generally owns the copyright, because most software does not fit any of the nine commissioned-work categories. The hiring company may receive only a license implied from the circumstances.
That is why contractor agreements typically say the work is made for hire “to the extent permitted by law” and then add a backup assignment of all rights that do not qualify. Copyright transfers must be in a writing signed by the person transferring the rights, so a handshake or an invoice is not enough.
Labels can also have side effects. In California, for example, state statutes connect a work-for-hire designation in a contract with an individual to employment status for certain purposes, which is one reason many agreements with individual contractors rely primarily on an assignment.
- Assign all deliverables and related IP, not just “the final product.”
- Require disclosure of third-party and open source components before they are included.
- Cover subcontractors, who must assign to the contractor or directly to the company.
- Include cooperation and further-assurance duties for future filings.
Why does “hereby assigns” language matter?
Present assignment language, such as “hereby assigns,” can transfer rights automatically as inventions and works are created. A promise that a person “agrees to assign” may be treated as only a promise to assign in the future, which can leave title with the individual.
Federal courts have drawn this distinction in patent ownership disputes, including cases where a later agreement using present assignment language with a different company prevailed over an earlier promise to assign. Well-drafted PIIAs and contractor agreements use present assignment language for future inventions, and many also include a power of attorney so the company can complete filings if the individual is unavailable.
Patent assignments can also be recorded with the USPTO. Recording helps put third parties on notice of the company’s ownership.
What is a PIIA, and what should it include?
A proprietary information and inventions assignment agreement, or PIIA, combines confidentiality obligations with an assignment of inventions and works an employee creates within the scope of the relationship. It is sometimes called a CIIAA or simply an invention assignment agreement.
Employees should sign a PIIA when they start, as a condition of employment. Asking a current employee to sign later raises questions about consideration and enforceability that vary by state.
- Confidentiality of the company’s proprietary information during and after employment.
- Present assignment of inventions, works of authorship, and related IP.
- A schedule where the employee lists prior inventions excluded from the assignment.
- Any notice required by state law, such as the California section 2870 notice.
- Return of company property and information at the end of employment.
- Cooperation with patent and copyright filings, plus a limited power of attorney.
How does California Labor Code section 2870 limit invention assignment?
Section 2870 makes an invention assignment provision unenforceable for inventions an employee develops entirely on their own time without the employer’s equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secrets, unless the invention relates to the employer’s business or research or results from work for the employer.
California also requires employers to give written notice of this limitation when an employment agreement includes an invention assignment, and PIIAs used with California employees typically attach the text of section 2870. Several other states, including Washington, Illinois, and Minnesota, have comparable statutes. State law varies, so the PIIA should be checked for each state where employees work.
What about founders and work done before the company existed?
Founders should assign to the company any technology, code, domain names, and other IP they created for the business before incorporation, usually through a technology assignment signed at formation alongside their stock purchase agreement.
Pre-formation work is a common gap. Founders often build a prototype for months before forming an entity, sometimes while employed elsewhere. If a founder’s prior employer has a claim to that work under its own PIIA, a later assignment to the startup may not resolve it, so that risk should be evaluated early. Prior inventions a founder intends to keep should be listed and, where the company needs them, licensed on clear terms.
Moral rights and open source deserve a brief check as well. Some foreign jurisdictions recognize moral rights that cannot be fully assigned, so agreements with international contributors often include a waiver or consent to the extent permitted. Open source code remains subject to its own license, so an assignment cannot transfer rights the contributor never had.
How does IP ownership affect financing and acquisition diligence?
Investors and acquirers typically ask for signed assignments from every founder, employee, and contractor who contributed to core technology. Missing or defective agreements can delay a closing, require confirmatory assignments, or reduce the value of the deal.
- Keep a log of every contributor, their role, dates, and the signed agreement.
- Audit contractor and agency agreements for present assignment language.
- Obtain confirmatory assignments while former contributors are still reachable.
- Maintain an inventory of open source components and their licenses.
Authoritative resources
- US Copyright Office: Circular 30, Works Made for Hire ↗
- Cornell Law School LII: 17 U.S.C. § 101, Definitions ↗
- Cornell Law School LII: 17 U.S.C. § 201, Ownership of Copyright ↗
- California Legislative Information: Labor Code § 2870 ↗
- USPTO: MPEP § 301, Ownership and Assignability of Patents and Applications ↗
Questions answered
Frequently asked questions
Does paying a contractor mean the company owns the code?
Not necessarily. Payment alone does not transfer copyright. Unless the work qualifies as a work made for hire or the contractor signs a written assignment, the contractor generally keeps ownership and the company may hold only an implied license. A written agreement with a present assignment is the usual solution.
What is the difference between a work for hire agreement and an IP assignment agreement?
A work for hire agreement tries to make the hiring party the legal author from the start, which works only for employees or the nine statutory categories of commissioned works. An IP assignment agreement transfers rights from the creator to the company and can cover software and inventions that fall outside those categories.
Do founders need to sign an IP assignment?
Yes. Founders should assign pre-formation technology and future work to the company, usually at incorporation. Investors commonly review founder assignments in diligence, and a founder who leaves without having signed one can create a serious ownership problem for the company.
Can a startup fix a missing IP assignment later?
Often, through a confirmatory or nunc pro tunc assignment signed by the contributor, sometimes with additional consideration. The fix depends on the contributor being available and willing, and on whether anyone else has acquired rights in the meantime, so it is easier to address early.
Does a PIIA cover inventions an employee makes on their own time?
It depends on state law and the agreement. In California, Labor Code section 2870 excludes inventions developed entirely on the employee’s own time without company resources, unless they relate to the employer’s business or result from work for the employer. Several other states have similar limits.
Continue reading
Build the complete outside-counsel picture.
A startup IP due diligence checklist
Employee or contractor? Classification and agreements
When should a startup hire its first lawyer?
MSA vs. SOW: how the two documents fit together
This article provides general information, not legal advice. Reading it or submitting the website form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Legal outcomes depend on the facts, contract language, and applicable law.
Continue the conversation